Head-to-head comparison
CyberGhost vs IPVanish; Streaming Focus vs Unlimited Device Coverage
Head-to-head comparison of CyberGhost and IPVanish for streaming reliability, privacy baseline, WireGuard performance, and value pricing.

Networking Editorial
Quick verdict
Recommended: CyberGhost
CyberGhost leads on streaming-centric value and lower entry pricing, while IPVanish stays competitive for users who need unlimited simultaneous connections across many devices.
CyberGhost
Better value-led entry pricing and a streaming-first consumer setup experience.
IPVanish
Unlimited-device allowance with dependable everyday performance on mainstream links.
Methodology
How we test and score
Every provider on this page is scored against the same criteria. Facts (pricing, protocol support, audit dates) are re-verified against vendor sources on the date shown next to each provider.
- Speed
- iperf3 throughput against a same-region endpoint on a 1 Gbps residential uplink, averaged across three consecutive runs at peak hours.
- Privacy
- Jurisdiction, published no-logs audit recency, diskless (RAM-only) server posture, and ownership independence.
- Auditing
- Only third-party audits published within the last 24 months contribute to the score. Vendor self-attestations are excluded.
- Protocol implementation
- Preference for native WireGuard and exportable peer configuration over proprietary protocols that block manual deployment.
- Configuration flexibility
- Router firmware availability, split tunneling, port forwarding, and IPv6 support are graded as boolean feature flags for machine-readable comparison.
Side-by-side comparison
Values below are re-verified against vendor documentation on the date shown in the final row.
| Metric | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $1.75/mo renews at $4.75/mo | $2.99/mo renews at $10.99/mo |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Refund window | 45 days | 30 days |
| Jurisdiction | Romania | United States |
| Logs policy | No-logs policy with published transparency and third-party verification | No-logs policy |
| Independent audit | Yes Deloitte | 2022-09-01 | No public audit |
| WireGuard | Native WireGuard | Native WireGuard |
| Speed rating | 4.3/ 5 | 4.3/ 5 |
| Median latency | 31 ms | 29 ms |
| Server locations | 100 | 75 |
| Streaming-optimized pools | Yes | Yes |
| Router firmware | No | No |
| Port forwarding | No | No |
| Multi-hop | No | No |
| Kill switch | Yes | Yes |
| Split tunneling | Yes | Yes |
| Unlimited devices | No | Yes |
| Facts verified | ||
| Discount | See CyberGhost Discount | See IPVanish Discount |
Deployment fit by household profile
CyberGhost generally fits users optimizing for media access and initial monthly value, while IPVanish fits larger households where connection-count flexibility is the defining requirement.
