Head-to-head comparison
IPRoyal Proxy vs CyberGhost VPN; Proxy vs VPN Technical Comparison
Compare IPRoyal Proxy and CyberGhost by use case, privacy model, request routing behavior, and practical deployment tradeoffs.
Networking Editorial
Quick verdict
Recommended: CyberGhost
CyberGhost is stronger for encrypted everyday browsing, streaming, and full-tunnel device protection. IPRoyal Proxy is stronger for request-level automation, scraping workflows, and geo-targeted testing where full-device encryption is not the priority.
IPRoyal Proxy
Best fit for proxy pools and request routing workloads across residential and datacenter paths.
CyberGhost
Best fit for full tunnel VPN use, easy app setup, and long-term plan value pricing.
Methodology
How we test and score
Every provider on this page is scored against the same criteria. Facts (pricing, protocol support, audit dates) are re-verified against vendor sources on the date shown next to each provider.
- Speed
- iperf3 throughput against a same-region endpoint on a 1 Gbps residential uplink, averaged across three consecutive runs at peak hours.
- Privacy
- Jurisdiction, published no-logs audit recency, diskless (RAM-only) server posture, and ownership independence.
- Auditing
- Only third-party audits published within the last 24 months contribute to the score. Vendor self-attestations are excluded.
- Protocol implementation
- Preference for native WireGuard and exportable peer configuration over proprietary protocols that block manual deployment.
- Configuration flexibility
- Router firmware availability, split tunneling, port forwarding, and IPv6 support are graded as boolean feature flags for machine-readable comparison.
Side-by-side comparison
Values below are re-verified against vendor documentation on the date shown in the final row.
| Metric |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $1.00/mo renews at $1.00/mo | $1.75/mo renews at $4.75/mo |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Refund window | 0 days | 45 days |
| Jurisdiction | Lithuania | Romania |
| Logs policy | Proxy service terms and usage logs depend on plan and traffic type | No-logs policy with published transparency and third-party verification |
| Independent audit | No public audit | Yes Deloitte | 2022-09-01 |
| WireGuard | Not offered | Native WireGuard |
| Speed rating | 4.1/ 5 | 4.3/ 5 |
| Median latency | 36 ms | 31 ms |
| Server locations | 195 | 100 |
| Streaming-optimized pools | No | Yes |
| Router firmware | No | No |
| Port forwarding | No | No |
| Multi-hop | No | No |
| Kill switch | No | Yes |
| Split tunneling | No | Yes |
| Unlimited devices | Yes | No |
| Facts verified | ||
| Visit | View Configuration | View Configuration |